My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Feminism: Sex & gender discussions

I suppose this proves that women just can't stand the heat.........

242 replies

seeker · 24/02/2013 10:23

here

OP posts:
Report
blueshoes · 24/02/2013 10:52

Part of the reason is the crippling cost of childcare and the fixation on parents (particularly mothers) being at home during the early years of a child's life.

Report
JoinLogin · 24/02/2013 10:54

If women can't afford to have a child then why do they still choose to have one?

Having children is a choice remember.

Report
blueshoes · 24/02/2013 11:02

Join, you are totally missing the point.

Women can afford to have children. Just not cover the cost of childcare to be able to afford to work during their early years.

Report
JoinLogin · 24/02/2013 11:05

There was a newspaper article a week or 2 ago about an unemployed mother with 11 children who was racking in all sorts of benefits including child support. She had so much she was able to buy and keep a horse.

Don't you think this is taking the p*ss?

Report
MerryCouthyMows · 24/02/2013 11:09

Is that you, GabbyLogon?!

Report
targaryen24 · 24/02/2013 11:09

It proves that things are still pretty stagnant when it comes to childcare. Plenty of women WANT to go back to work but earn so little that it seems stupid.

And join - articles like that do NOT represent a whole section of society. And yes, it is taking the piss.

Report
Schooldidi · 24/02/2013 11:10

join shouldn't your post say 'if a couple can't afford to have a child why do they still choose to have one'?

The cost of childcare should be weighed against both salaries but all too often it's only weighed against the woman's. Why is that? Because women are frequently the lower earners in the couple. Society still expects a woman to want to stay at home while the children are little whereas a man who wants to stay at home is seen as a bit odd. Childcare is still seen as the woman's problem with a lot of companies being happy to offer flexible working for mothers but not for fathers, which seems like it's woman friendly but it's placing more pressure on the women to be more responsible for the children than her partner.

Report
MurderOfGoths · 24/02/2013 11:10

Well that's some spectacular derailing.

Report
JoinLogin · 24/02/2013 11:10

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2282142/Mother-11-having-400k-taxpayer-funded-house-built-bought-flying-lessons-partner-Christmas-gift.html

Here you go. Child benefit can't be that low if claimants can buy a horse and flying lessons.

Report
JoinLogin · 24/02/2013 11:11

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by Mumsnet for breaking our Talk Guidelines. Replies may also be deleted.

Schooldidi · 24/02/2013 11:12

Join this thread wasn't supposed to be about benefits was it? I'm sure it was about women being pushed out of jobs with power, or was I dreaming that?

Report
MurderOfGoths · 24/02/2013 11:14

"Childcare is still seen as the woman's problem with a lot of companies being happy to offer flexible working for mothers but not for fathers, which seems like it's woman friendly but it's placing more pressure on the women to be more responsible for the children than her partner."

This absolutely!

Report
EstherRancid · 24/02/2013 11:16
Report
AnyFucker · 24/02/2013 11:16

Ignore the ignorant derailer

Report
EduCated · 24/02/2013 11:18

Back to the original point of the thread, it's sad to see were steadily slipping backwards instead of progressing in many ways Sad

Report
blueshoes · 24/02/2013 11:18

I sometimes wonder whether flexible working (which has become the norm in terms of the platter of HR benefits offered to professional women) has resulted in more women being sidelined that if there was not that option.

If it has the result of keeping women in work who would otherwise completely dropped out, it is good thing. But if it has the result of encouraging women to go pt who would otherwise have continued ft, then there's your answer. It also skews employers' attitudes towards women if so many of them request flexi working after children.

Report
targaryen24 · 24/02/2013 11:19

YOU GET £20 A WEEK! Hmm
Hardly rolling in it. That the equivalent to one weeks worth of nappies & wipes for me. If you're going to insult a large chunk of society it wouldn't hurt to do some research first...and maybe give up the Daily Mail for lent Grin

P.S benefits are calculated to allow enough money to get by
not swan about. However that family managed it, most don't & it is not a glamorous alternative to being employed. So get off your high, poorly informed horse. Cheers

Report
MrsLyman · 24/02/2013 11:20

What schooldi said.

I find it very depressing both from reading these boards and from listening to friends in real life how few people think that the cost of childcare has anything to do with the man in the relationships salary, or how few think that a man's career should progress at anything other than full steam ahead during the early years of their children's lives.

Report
hwjm1945 · 24/02/2013 11:24

I think it should be easier to step on and off career ladder.Sabbatical s etc so can pick up career etc at later stage.

Report
blueshoes · 24/02/2013 11:25

The stereotype, which I see played out at my workplace (City firm), is:

  • Men work harder once they have children, because children are a costly business.
  • Women work less or flexibly and become rather less contactable once they have children.


It is hardly surprising the men get promoted ahead of and in larger numbers than women, even though women are equal to or outnumber men at the entry level. However, there are also prejudices and soft barriers that stand in women's way that make the bar higher for them anyway. I am not discounting that.
Report
blueshoes · 24/02/2013 11:27

UK has one of the longest working hours in Europe. That makes UK more family unfriendly than other European countries. Another potential factor why women find it harder than their counterparts in Europe to get ahead at work, when you have all these men putting in the face time.

Report
Schooldidi · 24/02/2013 11:29

At my school there approx half of the female teachers with children have gone pt, there is one male teacher with children who is pt. He is thought of as a massive oddity, most other men don't even break stride when their partner has a baby. I am one of the ft female teachers with children and I am considered a bit of an oddity for not even requesting to go pt after ML. I don't even have huge plans for promotion but just love my job most of the time.

I do know a few couples where the woman is ft working and the man is a SAHD. It is seen as VERY unusual, whereas man working ft and woman SAHM is seen as the norm in the early years.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

Popcornia · 24/02/2013 11:29

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

MrsWolowitzerables · 24/02/2013 11:34

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

seeker · 24/02/2013 11:35

[shocked] but not surprised that this has become about childcare.

OP posts:
Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.