I'm a lurker in the feminism section, but name changed for this thread (regular though not prolific poster elsewhere on MN).
This is not a thread about a thread, but is inspired by posts on another thread where someone said that paedophiles are born that way, like gay people are born gay. I have quite firmly held beliefs that whilst gay people are born gay, paedophiles are not. I believe child rape has more to do with rape generally (power) than with sexuality. But reading the other thread has me questioning whether those beliefs are consistent with each other and, whilst it's not a feminist issue, I was hoping to get some discussion from a feminist perspective.
I have quite a bit invested in my beliefs. Being a lesbian and having been repeatedly raped as a child, I believe that being gay is what I always was, before the abuse and therefore not caused by it ("born gay") and that my rapist does not have any excuses for what he did (not "born that way"). Is this skewing my perspective? After all, paedophilia is much wider than child rape, perhaps child rape is a combination of power (rape) and an inherent sexual interest in children? I'd be interested to read discussion of this by people who can think about this more clearly than me.
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Feminism: Sex and gender discussions
Are paedophiles "born that way"?
75 replies
NameChangeForThisThread · 09/06/2011 19:32
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.