Our SN area is not a substitute for expert advice. While many Mumsnetters have a specialist knowledge of special needs, if they post here they are posting as members, not experts. There are, however, lots of organisations that can help - some suggestions are listed here. If you've come across an organisation that you've found helpful, please tell us. Go to Special needs chat, Parents with disabilities, SN teens, SN legal, SN education, SN recommendations.

Is it only parents of SN children who have to deal with this

(38 Posts)
meaty Tue 26-Mar-13 10:59:03

Today the senco phones me to ask that tomorrow I pick up DS (5yo) at 1pm as they dont have a TA for his 1:1 after lunch. For the first time I said 'no' and that didn't please them.

In the past they just tell me he is ill and I pick him up but after the last time where it turned out his TA had gone home ill and my son was fully fit and well I had just had enough.

He is part time even though it is the term past his 5th birthday as the school says that it is in his benefit. I am in the process of getting a statement to bring this all to an end but from the snails pace it goes at I dont think I will get one in place until the start of the next year. He already has SA+, IEP, Ed Phsyc, OT, Pead, SALT so I am tying it all up in a single legal document.

If you are a parent of an average child surely they would always find replacement teachers to cover sickness/absence why is it that I feel that parents of SN children are treated differently? Is it cost? lack of experience?

meaty Tue 26-Mar-13 14:51:31

Right I have picked up DS from school and here in writing is the reason for part time hours.

"... now attends school from 9.30-2.30 daily, which appears to be right for him. He gets weary towards the end of the week". So there we have it in writing the reason for part time hours.

meaty Tue 26-Mar-13 14:58:27

icecakeandflower - I did see that report which got me thinking is it only parents of SN children or do schools try to do that sort of thing to other children as well.

Thankyou for giving me details for the inclusion service. I will searching for one in Somerset by asking the parent partnership.

Ouryve - When he was excluded he didn't understand as he cannot communicate he just enjoyed being at home. I wrote on this board at the time and someone pointed out that I should be working hard with DS to stop the hitting. I have put huge effort into this area and now he doesnt hit anymore as they were correct to point out that it is the parent responsibility as well. I suspect that in this area an average child would have been excluded as well.

With the statement they are actually giving me a hand making sure that everything needed is noted down within the application so fingers crossed that goes well.

Dinkysmummy Tue 26-Mar-13 17:38:39

I can't believe he was excluded for 5 days! Poor you and your DS!

Dinky hit her teacher because she touched dinky without warning (trying to direct her into the area she needed her to go). From then on the teacher refused to deal with her when she has meltdowns. Instead she runs off to senco for every little thing. Now we are being forced out of the school and dinky is going to a new school after Easter.

I think 5 days is excessive as the reason dinky wasn't excluded was because they know she has SN, and didn't understand what she was doing at the time. She said sorry after.

Poor TAs? No way! They get paid to look after your DS. It doesn't matter how challenging the DC is they should make sure he gets his full time education. Sure if you want to have part time because you think it is better for him. But no way ok if they want him to be part time because they can't handle him (and that's their problem not your DS or yours).

I hope you manage to get in touch with an inclusion service. I would also talk to them about having to drive up to the farm trip to pick him up as that can't be right.

I really feel for you and your little man. He deserves better and so do you.

flowers

mymatemax Tue 26-Mar-13 19:28:24

unless you feel his current hours are in his best interest I would insist on full time hours.
The term after his 5th birthday they are legally obliged to educate him, they should not be offering him a lesser education as a result of his disability
The TA's needing a break, staffing levels, budgets are not your concern, the head gets paid to resolve theses issues.
They must provide a safe, sutable, education (adjusted to take in to account his disability) equal to his peers
Their inability to cope should urge them to shout for additional help/statement/outreachs upport etc, it should not be a reason for them to send him home.
Hopefully it will help you achieve the statment & provision he needs

Trigglesx Tue 26-Mar-13 19:39:51

He gets weary at the end of the week? That's their reasoning? I suspect they'll have to do better than that. Lots of children get weary at the end of the week. How's he ever going to build up to the FT schedule if they don't have a plan to reintegrate him into FT?

As for the TA needing a break, they should be using 2 TAs minimum for him anyway. DS2's school had a set schedule for his TAs. One TA did 5 mornings and 2 afternoons a week (always the same ones), a second TA did 3 afternoons per week. Then there was a third TA that popped in two mornings a week for about 30 minutes while his main TA led the school's SNs physio class (she did DS2's physio 1:1 at another time as he coped better that way).

This worked very well - when one TA was ill, one of the other 2 simply stepped in. He was used to working with them, so it wasn't any problem. His main TA coordinated his lesson plans (with his teacher, adding extras that assisted his learnign styles) and did reports during the 3 afternoons per week that she was not with him. It also meant he didn't get dependent on one particular TA.

ouryve Tue 26-Mar-13 20:07:06

Even though my boys have one TA with them for most of the day, they have points in their day when their own 1:1s have lunch etc, so are, or have been covered by the various floating TAs so they're not entirely strange faces. This also means that their own TAs are with them at lunchtime, which is often more difficult for them behaviour-wise than classroom time.

DS2 can't function without 1:1 at any point in the day, partly because he has a tendency to wander off. A few weeks, he'd get into school and start to strip off. If his regular 1:1 is delayed either another floating TA will drop everything for 10 minutes or DS1's TA will take him with them on their morning errands (DS1 likes having jobs to do to get him settled in the morning - it gives him chance to survey his surroundings and focus his mind through the I was at home but now I'm at school but I'm not quite ready to talk to anyone yet transition).

This is why I'm hmm when schools claim they can't cover lunchtimes or whatever. It always strikes me that there's more inflexibility and lack of imagination on the part of the school than there is in a child with ASD. Even DS2 can manage a short period in a small group, if needs be and when DS1 is calm and interested enough to be occupied, he appreciates not having someone breathing down his neck All The Time. Breathers for a TA and flexibility to cover the biggest flashpoints can be built into the day.

There's also the fact that a class teacher does need to spend a little time with the child - yet another breather, however brief, even if it only gives a chance to talk to a child in the class with a sunnier disposition and be reassured that all is right with the world, despite the earbashing they've had delivered for the past hour!

Trigglesx Tue 26-Mar-13 20:16:20

yes, like ouryve's son, DS2 had someone literally with him from the time we handed him over in the morning until he was handed back at the end of the school day - through lunch, playtimes, and even escorting him to the toilet (he's impulsive/runner with no sense of danger/safety so cannot be unmonitored at all). His school was very clear that it was their responsibility to make sure someone was with him and to include him in all activities (at least encouraging him to try, such as assembly and trips and everything), regardless of their particular staffing levels.

It's all about the school being flexible and organised (and recognising their responsibilities).

MummytoMog Wed 27-Mar-13 15:01:54

That's shocking. Are they trying to push you out?

DD was excluded from the class panto trip. We offered to go with her, but couldn't because we don't have current CRBs. What really ticked me off about that is DD has been going to the theatre since she was a few days old (DH is a musician) and knows perfectly well what to do and would have been no bother at all.

starfishmummy Wed 27-Mar-13 15:57:21

I agree with Ouryve - the ideal would be for him to have two 1:1s who job share; each working part of every day so that the whole day can be covered and arranged so that if he needs support over the lunch period oine of them does it and has his or her break at a different time

MareeyaDolores Wed 27-Mar-13 22:42:37

I don't think they can insist on sending a child home early 'because they're tired'. In fact, if he's so tired from something the other kids manage, then they need an OT to assess what's happening to his sensory and energy levels.

If you give notice in writing that you won't be able to pick him up early, they'll stop doing this I think. Not picking up a kid at hometime, fair enough, they can call social services for neglect. Not picking up a kid before school is finished, just because the school cba to give a full day's education.. I doubt they'd want to be publicising that wink

extremepie Tue 02-Apr-13 23:04:50

My son has recently started school and has ASD and an awful lot of what has been said on this thread sounds very familiar - tbh, not having any previous experience of schools I just thought it was normal but am now starting to think it isn't?

For example, they have asked us on maybe 3/4 occasions to pick him up early (lunchtime) because he is 'having a bad day' of they are struggling to deal with him. Also they have asked us to keep him off school twice (whole day) to give his TA a chance to plan lessons for him as she can't do it when he is there apparently.

They ask us to pick him up at 3 (instead of 3.15 - not a major difference) because his TA has to leave at 3 and I have to stay with him through breakfast club in the morning until she comes in (about 45 minutes).

Recently on a school trip they asked me to go with DS because his TA had to accompany another group of children.

They have also reduced his hours at school
from full time to finishing at 1 every day because they are, essentially, finding him hard work!

Is this normal?

Should I say something?

Ilisten2theradio Fri 05-Apr-13 16:08:32

Extremepie
As others have pointed out to Meaty earlier, the DDA states that your child should not be disadvantaged.
Sending a child home early like this is illegal exclusion. There have been various things in the press about this lately.
If I were you I would say something ( well lots of somethings if it were me) - all backed up by relevant legistation
If school cannot cope with your child for a full day then perhaps it is time to look at statementing to formalise the help that he will get.

bochead Fri 05-Apr-13 16:10:43

Contact a family are doing a survey and a campaign on exactly this issue. Well worth following up with them as together we have a voice.

Join the discussion

Join the discussion

Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.

Register now