It was the Yr 9 options evening last night - the first time they'd dared to reveal the options columns to parents and pupils.
And our misgivings were confirmed - they've broadened the range of subjects to include lots more BTECs including media studies, hair and beauty, sociology.
As well as the core subjects, dd has to choose one from each of 5 columns.
4 choices are ok (ish), but there's nothing in the 5th column she wants to do - the choice is:
-Triple science (she will definitely do double, but she doesn't want triple after seeing her sister struggle with it, also the school has been told to improve science and maths teaching)
-AS level music (she'd need grade 5, only has grade 3 and stopped playing in primary school and doesn't really want to pick it up again),
- Or a load of what we (and she) consider to be Mickey Mouse subjects - non-academic (BTEC) ones where she has no interest and would likely be in with a bunch of disruptive kids.
Ideally, if they could move Art GCSE from the column where it clashes with History (she'd love to do both), or allow her to study Art externally (we'd arrange that and pay) and sit in the back of the art class and get on with work for that while others are doing their 5th column options, she'd be happy, problem solved.
But the headteacher is adamant she has to choose a 5th column option, and that the options columns are a fait accompli not a consultation document.
She doesn't really want to move schools - very happy there with good friends - but this seems the only option if she wants to do the subjects she'd like.
Has anyone had any luck in persuading a school to be more flexible? How did you do it? Or did you come up with an alternative arrangement?
Finally, how much does private day school cost on average? I'm seriously contemplating looking into taking her out of state sector because of the political interference that is forcing them to offer so many non-academic subjects - it might suit those who are non-academic, but imo is penalising the academic ones.