Had secondary school appeal today - seeking opinions on our experience.
Our presentation was at 3.30. Had feeling that we would be in middle of day. Tried to contact clerk before the hearing to see if we had a set time limit to present our case - no response.
Had spent many hours researching the school's case (voluntary aided) and replying to every point they raised. I knew that we would not get round to all our points- but was expecting some time to counter-act the schools case.
When came to hearing; we were given a quite extensive list on what we could not ask by the clerk. This was before we started to present; and I admit both my partner and I (co-presenting) were stumped not be able to ask the questions that we had prepared to counteract the school's case. We were advised to raise our social and medical needs only (son has a few medical issues and experienced extensive bullying at primary). No information was given as to why the school's case was not being questioned until a panel member jumped to our aid and told clerk 'that that was unfair' , we were then afforded that the panel had heard counter-actions to the school's case eleven times over (which must be challenging). I asked them to sum up what they had found out so far - only a small amount of our material.
We tried to raise other points (non-abrasively) - but were interrupted a few times. I am sure that (if we were allowed) we may have raised some new points that hadn't been addressed before. Whenever we contradicted the governor; the chair said that we 'were going round in circles'. I saw it rather as healthy debate.
We pushed on through and gave only some of our information and a strong summary of our case. The clerk approached us afterwards and apologised saying that he hoped that he had not affected our input. I felt compromised at this point (as I know that we are not really supposed to be giving information outside of the hearing). I told him that we had points to counter-act every part of the governor's statement and pointed out how much research we had done.
Every bit of research/conversation I have had has suggested that there would be some time to counteract the school's case and that everyone would be listened to in full without interruption - feel a little cheated.
Is this usual practice towards the end of the day if the panel have heard a few cases before. Were they trying to make it easier for us/ have they denied us a full hearing?
All views welcomed
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.
Secondary education
What Do You Think Of This Secondary Appeals Experience?
6 replies
GirlInASwirl · 13/06/2014 07:56
OP posts:
tiggytape ·
13/06/2014 23:26
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.