My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Connect with other parents whose children are starting secondary school on this forum.

Secondary education

Is it discriminatory to issue penalty notices for term time absence to both parents?

80 replies

minisale · 05/07/2013 13:28

Our LEA has a policy of issuing a fine to each parent for each child if you take them out of school for 5 consecutive days. So a two parent family will receive four penalty notices of £50 each while a single parent family will receive just two for the same act. The impact of taking the two children out of school is exactly the same. Is this discriminating against two parent families and therefore is it illegal for the County Council to implement this policy? Ideas, knowledge, experiences and views gratefully received.

OP posts:
Report
TobyLerone · 05/07/2013 13:34

I can't see how it's discriminatory Confused

In both cases, each parent effectively gets two fines.

I would be incredibly pissed off, however, if my DCs' father decided to take them on holiday during term time and I got a fine for it. Not that that would happen, because I obviously wouldn't agree to it, but theoretically it could.

Report
prh47bridge · 05/07/2013 15:33

The law says they can do this. It is not illegal.

Report
timidviper · 05/07/2013 15:38

I think it may not be illegal but it is unfair.

School trips and other expenses are charged per child, imagine the outcry if children in a 2 parent family were charged double for a school trip. What about children who split their time between 2 parents who are both in new relationships do they get 4 fines? What a nonsensical policy!

The impact of the absence is the same regardless of the number of parents living at the home so I think the fine should be per child.

Report
flowery · 05/07/2013 16:34

Why wouldn't they fine both parents just because they aren't in a relationship?

Report
prh47bridge · 05/07/2013 17:59

timidviper - No there would not be 4 fines. Only parents can be fined.

The parent is committing the offence of failing to secure their child's attendance at the school. Both parents are guilty of that offence if the child is not attending. Why shouldn't they both be fined?

Report
tiggytape · 05/07/2013 18:52

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

TobyLerone · 05/07/2013 19:01

It would make more sense if the fine were, say, £50, and they split it between everyone with PR. So if 1 person has PR, they pay £50. If 2 people have PR (either living together or apart), they pay £25 each.

Otherwise it just looks like a ridiculous money-spinning exercise...

Oh, wait.

Report
flowery · 05/07/2013 19:13

OP do you actually know they don't fine both parents if they don't happen to live together, or are you assuming?

Report
tiggytape · 05/07/2013 19:18

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

SugarSpunSisters · 05/07/2013 19:33

I work at the CAB and had a couple with three kids who had been taken abroad for five weeks - each been fined £60 each child, per parent. This wasn't paid and the fine was raised to £120 per child, per parent Shock none negotiable and next step was Magistrares court.

I'm glad they don't get sent to the mum by default.

Report
prh47bridge · 06/07/2013 20:05

That is the same everywhere in England. The government sets the rules. From September the fine goes up from £60 to £120 if it is not paid within 21 days (currently you have 28 days to pay at the lower rate). If it remains unpaid after 28 days (42 days at the moment) the LA may prosecute.

I disagree with TobyLerone. As Tiggytape says, if you go shoplifting with your partner you will both be fined. You won't get one fine to split between you even though you would only have had to pay for the goods once. That isn't a ridiculous money-spinning exercise. You are still fully responsible for your actions (or lack of action) even if there is someone else involved.

If the child has an unauthorised absence both parents have committed an offence. I really can't see any reason why they shouldn't both be fined the full amount.

Report
OddBoots · 06/07/2013 20:10

I think the concept of it being a fine for breaking the law is being lost in the phrasing of some discussions where it is discussed as being part of a holiday cost. It isn't a 'time off school' ticket that can be bought.

Report
xylem8 · 07/07/2013 10:32

My youngest goes to a tiny rural primary miles from anywhere who are always wanting more pupils.I am planning to deregister them before we go and then re-register when we come back.

Report
StealthPolarBear · 07/07/2013 10:36

Which minority group would it be discriminating against? two parent families? Hmm

It's fining everyone who has PR for the child, rather than just focussing on the "feckless mother". Good!

Report
EliotNess · 07/07/2013 10:37

no - in fact IME most go to parents who are split up.

Report
ShipwreckedAndComatose · 07/07/2013 10:47

Xylem, you can only due register if you state which school they will be moving too...in my understanding. Unless you say you will be home educating.

Strikes me as a ridiculous thing to contemplate just to go on a holiday you could take at a different time.

What if the school does not accept your child back?

Report
prh47bridge · 07/07/2013 13:51

The school will have to accept xylem's child back if they have a space. However, if the school issues a penalty notice in these circumstances I would expect the LA and the courts to uphold it.

Report
OldLadyKnowsNothing · 07/07/2013 13:59

Do NRPs get fined? How do they deal with totally absent parents, who never see their dc/pay maintenance, even though they have PR?

Report
CloudsAndTrees · 07/07/2013 15:37

No, it's not discriminatory. It's making both parents responsible for their children, which is a good thing.

If both parents have chosen to do something that could result in a fine,mother both of them should be fined!

Report
MirandaWest · 07/07/2013 15:55

I won't be taking the DC out of school and neither will XH but would both of us be fined if the other one did? We both have PR but I don't really see how one of us could prevent the other one if we were really determined to.

Report
EliotNess · 07/07/2013 16:01

Old lady. Dunno.

Report
xylem8 · 07/07/2013 16:04

prhbridge surely they cannot issue a notice to a child not even registered at tge school.

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

tiggytape · 07/07/2013 16:20

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

xylem8 · 07/07/2013 18:13

It will only be 2 weeks! My DD was home educted for 6 months in the past and didn't hear a peep from the LEA.

Report
tiggytape · 07/07/2013 18:41

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.