Water meter or not?

(34 Posts)
workingtitle Wed 19-Jun-13 06:21:37

Dull question I know, but... We've just moved into our new house and it is the first place we've had that doesn't have a meter. I was planning on getting one installed but wondered whether it's actually a good idea with a baby on the way? I guess the only real additional water use will be a few more washing loads per week. Any thoughts?

MephistophelesSister Thu 20-Jun-13 09:40:04

valiumrehead - how long ago were you with Thames? Last 5 years have seem HUGE increases with them. Tiny 1 bed flat = £240/ year for us unmetered. With Severn Trent we pay £130/year for a 3 bed house.

Neither is huge, but Thames has had a 10% + increase for every year we have been with them.

valiumredhead Thu 20-Jun-13 10:27:10

Meph-we moved out of London 6 years ago. We were paying less than 20 a month, now on a meter with Anglian 35-40 and that'd with 3 people and a super super eco shower!

valiumredhead Thu 20-Jun-13 10:27:18

That's

Turnipinatutu Thu 20-Jun-13 10:30:17

I'd have to disagree about the bath/shower thing.
When we had a shower over bath, I used to periodically put the plug in whilst I had a shower to test this theory and the bath was never anywhere near as full as I would have run it to be.
Power showers, you may well be right and if people have extended showers. But a standard length, non power shower, uses much less water.

valiumredhead Thu 20-Jun-13 10:35:01

I agree standard showers use much less water. Power showers use loads.

workingtitle Thu 20-Jun-13 15:44:47

Turnip I'm so pleased they're coming to look, and thanks Mrsladybirdface for saying how to check--that's useful to know.

Jan49 Thu 20-Jun-13 20:02:13

We now live in a house with a meter and judging by the first bill, it works out at about £460 annual. The last annual non-meter bill at our previous house was £440, so similar. Two people in house. About 1-2 showers a day, about 3 washing machine loads per week. Both 3 bed houses.

workingtitle Thu 20-Jun-13 20:31:43

Well the water co. have just sent the first bill, 544 for 6 months! We were paying less than that in a year at the old place with a meter, albeit smaller property, no baby, no dishwasher. So definitely going for a meter.

specialsubject Fri 21-Jun-13 20:53:30

it depends not just on your use but also on where you live. Thames Water were very cheap with a meter but are now racking up the bills with a captive audience - everyone who moves in the area has to have a meter. They have lots of leaks to fix and fatcats to pay.

I now live further north in a house with a septic tank and it is much cheaper NOT to have a meter.

do the estimate on your water company's figures and then decide.

Join the discussion

Join the discussion

Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.

Register now