My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Join our Primary Education forum to discuss starting school and helping your child get the most out of it.

Primary education

Same spellings in year 2 as year 1?

23 replies

jb707 · 02/11/2013 19:48

My son is in year 2. He has noticed that the spellings he has this term are the same as he had in year 1. Is this common place?

OP posts:
Report
mrz · 02/11/2013 20:02

Spellings aren't commonplace ...each school has their own methods

Report
Periwinkle007 · 02/11/2013 20:03

that doesn't sound right to me, could it be that last year he was given some more advanced ones than the others in the class and this year the teacher hasn't realised that? I would pop a note in his bag saying that you 'think' the spellings are the same as last year, is he bringing home the right list? and then see what the teacher says.

Report
redskyatnight · 02/11/2013 20:10

DD's old school did that all the time. They called it "consolidation". Grin

Report
Huitre · 02/11/2013 21:30

Unless he already spells them right every time he uses them in his writing, it probably doesn't matter that much (and if he does, you could just ignore them).

Report
Mashabell · 03/11/2013 07:58

Words which teachers give for learning are almost invariably ones with some irregulary used letters (e.g. teacher, learning, ones). A few pupils are able to spell correctly after learning them once, but most need lots of relearning before they are able to do so consistently.

Count yourself lucky if your son is able to learn to spell easily.

Report
mrz · 03/11/2013 09:23

Some spelling lists from one school's web site ...irregular masha?

away say
good again I’ll boy soon
cat round animals night
long tree never narrator
how things next
did new shouted first car
man after us
going lots three
where eat food need head
would everyone fox that’s
king
or our town
took way fish I’ve
school has been gave around
think yes stop mouse every
home play must something garden
take red bed fast
didn’t may ran dog right still
well sea found

Report
Mashabell · 03/11/2013 11:49

Can't read the list properly, Mrz, and am in a hurry.

Teachers often mix regular with irregular spellings (partly because they are not fully aware which are which).

Spellings for some sounds (ee, long oo) are completely unpredictable (see me ski, fool rule).

Report
OldRoan · 03/11/2013 11:55

I have a 1-2 split class and we are currently doing the first 100 high frequency words, so the year two children probably did do them last year.

Some of them are getting 4/10, so I don't feel bad about the possibility of repeating spellings from a previous year.

Report
mrz · 03/11/2013 13:26

The formatting disappeared masha but some sample words from the lists

cat, man, did, long, bed, dog, and, yes, stop, red, fast ...

Report
Minime85 · 03/11/2013 14:51

as a secondary school English teacher, any consolidation of spellings can only be a good thing. trust me!

Report
mrz · 03/11/2013 15:09

even though the evidence shows spelling tests a poor way to teach spelling?

Report
Minime85 · 03/11/2013 15:22

I think if this is married with using in context at school and home as well as learning any particularly rules it won't do any harm.

Report
mrz · 03/11/2013 15:32

rules?

Report
Ihatespiders · 03/11/2013 17:46

The school I teach at uses a variety of methods for spellings.

We do send home a weekly list. This may be fully personalised, based on an assessment at the start of each term that spots patterns that each pupil is weak at (eg words ending-ck, or -tion). Personalised lists can also come from errors I've highlighted in their written work (whith, sor, etc)

Alternatively, I set spellings differentiated at a group level based on that week's topics. This might be maths vocab (eg names of shapes) or a spelling pattern that we've looked at in phonics (we're doing irregular plurals this week).

The lists based on the assessments and their own errors may well cause repeats to occur if there are spelling patterns that a pupil finds more tricky. I will set 'with' again and again until the child starts to use it correctly instead of whith.

Report
Minime85 · 03/11/2013 18:14

sorry things like silent e, adding ed, adding ful etc

Report
mrz · 03/11/2013 18:18

Oh dear

Report
Ihatespiders · 03/11/2013 18:26

"silent e"?

Thought we all talked about split digraphs nowadays?

Report
mrz · 03/11/2013 19:11
Report
GuinevereOfTheRoyalCourt · 03/11/2013 20:39

"even though the evidence shows spelling tests a poor way to teach spelling?"

Mrz - I have been reading these boards now for several years and I have huge respect for your expert opinions. But... My eldest dc was always in the top group for spellings at his infant school, and had little trouble learning them so always did well in his tests.

He then went up to the linked juniors. They didn't do spelling tests and I was always reassured reading here that they were old hat anyway. Spellings were instead being taught via phonics and what I assume to be the 'modern' methods. I really really tried to be open minded, trust me I did.

Unfortunately, dc's spelling in written work deteriorated significantly in the last couple of years. I was starting to get seriously worried. Now suddenly the school has had a change of heart and since the beginning of this term (now in yr5), a weekly spelling test has been introduced. And do you know what? My dc's spelling in written work has leapt forwards immeasurably.

Now it could be a coincidence. But... But...

Report
Mashabell · 04/11/2013 09:39

Many children's spelling seems to deteriorate around Y2 and Y2, when they begin to do less controlled, independent writing.

There are at least 4,000 common English words with irregular/unpredictable spellings. Even bright pupils take around 10 years to learn them all. Many can still not spell large numbers of them 'correctly' by the time they leave school. Progress in learning them is by no means even.

Report
mrz · 04/11/2013 18:19

GuinevereOfTheRoyalCourt I don't think I have said that children don't find it easy to learn lists only that all the research shows that sending home lists of words to learn is a poor way to teach spelling.

Report
Mashabell · 05/11/2013 08:51

sending home lists of words to learn is a poor way to teach spelling

Sending home lists for learning is ok. It's class testing and how the results are used that can be pointless and absolutely horrible for poor spellers. (There is nothing wrong with children testing themselves on a computer as part of learning to spell.)

Even if no lists are sent home, learning to spell English is mainly matter of learning lists: blue shoe flew through to you too... leave, sleeve, believe, even... see me by the sea...

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

mrz · 05/11/2013 20:02

You might teach with your lists masha Hmm but some schools actually teach children how to spell without confusing them

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.