I know it's rather late in the day to be asking this (35+3) but i was reading a thread on here yesterday about short labour and it's been worrying me.
My first labour was 6 hours long. My waters gushed at 3 in the morning, contractions followed and he was born just before 9am. I have a feeling that my labour would have been much quicker if they hadn't kept me on the bed for the whole thing.
I mentioned the fact that my first labour was rather quick to my midwife on my booking appointment, but unfortunately, i've had a different one at every midwife appointment that i've had, so i'm not sure that the message has got through. I now live 30 mins away from hospital, 45-1 hour in rush hour and am considered high risk because of another medical condition so it's essential that i give birth in hospital (vaginal delivery should be fine, but cesarian would be quite complicated). I haven't received any advice about what to do if my labour is significantly quicker than last time, so i'm really quite clueless about what i'd do in that situation.
To add to this, i lost my mucus plug yesterday and i don't have another appointment until next thursday, so i'm a bit concerned that if i don't do something now, i could lose my window to get any advice about it at all.
Any experience/advice?
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Get updates on how your baby develops, your body changes, and what you can expect during each week of your pregnancy by signing up to the Mumsnet Pregnancy Newsletters.
Pregnancy
Should my midwife be more concerned that my first labour was only 6 hours long?
19 replies
Cookethenook · 25/04/2013 08:43
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.