I was told in early 2011 my job was being made redundant: the tasks would be split between two new roles, neither of which seemed suitable. I took redeployment outside my department (huge organisation) at a lower grade.
I just found out that three new people were appointed. One of them (the role I wasn't told about) seems to be massively similar to my old role. I never saw it advertised externally or internally. It went to the wife of one of my former colleagues there (who is qualified for the role). In addition, of the two roles I knew about, I had been told that I wasn't suitable for one, as I lacked a specific qualification. I think (and I'm in the process of verifying) that the person who was appointed also lacks the qualification.
I'm not saying I should necessarily have got any of the roles. I do think I should have been able to apply.
I've written to HR to ask when and where the third job was advertised, and the job description.
If the facts are as I understand them, I have a legitimate grievance, don't I? Is it worth pursuing? I don't want to be reinstated in my old department, so what could I hope for - an apology, compensation? Is it worth it? I want to stay in the institution, so should I keep my head down so as not to be branded a trouble-maker?
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Mumsnet has not checked the qualifications of anyone posting here. If you have any legal concerns we suggest you consult a solicitor.
Legal matters
employment question - do I have a grievance?
4 replies
NicknameTaken · 11/01/2012 15:36
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.