ok, so two different employment issues, both have which have really upset me, and discovered both on the same day.
- I am currently acting up to managers position for an employment programme and have been doing so since July. It has been going really well,i was thrown in with no handover what so ever, and no more senior help available,so director pushed me to interview for it on a perm basis, which I did. However, when I put in the application he was unaware I am pregnant, however I have since told him an attempt to be honest. I had the interview on Monday and it went really well- his words. I answered all the questions etc without issue, and apparently gave the best presentation. The next day he asked what my maternity plans were etc and what I would do if I got the job. Anyway, had meeting today- didn't get the job. Apparently pipped at the post, however he wants me to stay in post until I go on mat leave in January and train up new person- a man incidentally. He also wants me to do all the things I was marked down on against this man, i.e. funding applications, because this new manager won't have started and they have to be in this month. Anyway, I am pissed off because he told me that he had no doubt I could do the job, and I am still going to have to do the bit this man apparently was stronger at anyway, then just go away quietly in the new year. So, my question is, would I be unreasonable to refuse to do it, and say I just want to go back to my old job, and basically tell the director he should deal with it himself if he didn't want to give it to me permanently?
- second pissed off point.
I am currently managing a complete useless twit and we are putting him on a work plan next week to manage out. He started just before I was promoted, however if I wasn't acting up, we would be on the same grade. I just discovered today that he is being paid 2.5k a year more than me on my old grade- despite the corporate service manager telling me that all new starts had to go in at the bottom of the scale. I have now been told, that when I go back to my old job, I have to to go back to my old salary too, at the bottom of the grade six scale. I feel this is unfair as a) i am currently doing a job 3 grades higher and being paid 8k more, b) he is completely incompetent at his job and still is being paid 2.5 k more.
Could this be seen as sex discrimination as on paper he is in no way better qualified than me?
My mum has suggested I step down from managers job unless they put me in at the top of the grade 6 scale when I do go back, and tell them that they should act the other useless twit up as they obviously feel he is a better candidate than me??And there is no-one else on a higher grade that could do it.
I know I may be over-reacting, but I just feel totally taken advantage of.