I have just bought a house with my recently retired mother, to enable her to buy a decent-sized place with a garden and space for family to stay. The house is exclusively for her. I live abroad and don't actually yet own a place myself though would like to buy soon.
I have put in 30%, she's put in 70%. We will hold the property as tenants in common. Rather foolishly we have left drawing up the trust deed till after the purchase, and are trying to work out how best to do it now, so that it is fair to both. We now somewhat disagree as we didn't have anything clear in advance and now it's all 'well you gave me the impression that' and 'what I really meant was'... sigh
Anyway I would appreciate your views on what would be a fair solution.
So, so far our solicitor has proposed 2 draft deeds.
Deed 1 says we own the house 70-30, full stop.
Deed 2 says we own it 70-30, but my mother will have sole right of occupancy and will also be responsible for all major property expenses/renovation, which she will recover on sale before we split the remainder 70-30.
Either of these would be fine with me, except that my mum doesn't actually want to follow the second one in practice - she expects me to contribute more money to renovation/improvement works. I don't want to - I've put in a lot of money already, and want to keep the rest of what I have for my own needs. On the other hand, I accept that I may have given this impression in earlier conversations - at some point I said I would go up to 80k total investment. I've now put in 75k so I can accept putting in the extra 5 - but don't want to spend any more.
How best to reflect this in the deed?
I am afraid of ending up on bad terms over this. We don't share the same view of what the arrangement represents. She sees it as a good investment for me, and seems to think I have the same interest in doing it up as she does - even though I will never live there. I see it more as a favour to her - parking my money in a kind of long-term loan with no capital guarantee - so that she can live well. There's also a considerable cost to me in that my own purchasing power is constrained when I come to buy my own place, whereas - as I see it - most of the benefit of the arrangement accrues to her.
Would it be better to reflect this in the deed, so that instead of splitting it into percentage shares, I simply ask for a fixed amount back on sale? e.g. original amount plus small percentage? Would this make the ownership/responsibility issue clearer?
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
Discuss investments with other users on our Investment forum. For more advice read our tips for saving for your child's future.
Investments
Fair tenancy in common agreement with mother?
2 replies
Yika · 01/09/2010 05:47
OP posts:
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.