My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

News

Do politicians go to 'Smarm School?'

8 replies

bubble99 · 04/08/2005 20:39

Hazel Blears was on the radio the other morning. I told her to climb down before she burnt herself on the toaster........

Anyway.....I'm very sad to hear the Mo Mowlam is so ill. She's always struck me as a conscience politician, one who speaks her mind. I remember hearing her interviewed after she'd obviously upset the inner sanctum and been told to spout the party line on an issue. The words sounded so wrong and stilted.

Blears, Kelly, Jowell....they all sound the same to me. I imagine the Today programme is a trial by fire for a lot of politicians. They are live and often seem to employ the tactics used by contestants on Just a Minute....spinning out evasive non-answers until the end of the interview time. They also sound the bloomin' same, even down to the same voice tones. Are they coached in this? It drives me mad and I often switch the radio off in disgust. Mind you, I switch it off less now John Reid isn't Health Secretary.....couldn't stand him.

OP posts:
Report
snafu · 04/08/2005 20:43

They are pretty interchangeable, I agree. Although of course Kelly does sound like a public school swot... All trained to say absolutely nothing using as many words as possible. All devoid of personality or individuality.

V. sad about Mo as well. Anyone who can call Martin McGuinness 'babe' has got to have something going for her

Report
monkeytrousers · 04/08/2005 21:32

Yes, they are coached. They have to be as the media are just as slippery. It's a constant battle between the two. The media wants viewers or readers, full stop. Politicians know they won't get the coverage for a policy decision unless it's deemed 'news worthy' but also won't get full coverage with details included as they think readers and viewers will become board and switch over or buy another paper with a more sensational headline the next day. Reporters are always trying to force the agenda too, even when it's irrelevant to the real issue. It's sod's law basically, and we come off worse for it.

Report
hunkermunker · 04/08/2005 21:36

Yes, they have media training.

Report
bubble99 · 04/08/2005 22:05

But surely the point of media training is to enable them to get their point across? Their identikit personas/tones make me incredibly frustrated and cause the opposite result....I switch off.

OP posts:
Report
monkeytrousers · 04/08/2005 22:19

You're not the only one Bubble. But since the internet, people can get their information any way they prefer, so even the 'quality' media need to rethink their approach. Politicians are just reacting to the media and vice versa, and us out here needing the info get nada.

Report
Milge · 04/08/2005 22:59

they also have to remain "on message" during their tv appearances - personal views are not encouraged so they hide behind their media training and the party line - difficult to tell them apart.

Report
edam · 04/08/2005 23:06

Can anyone tell me, what is the point of Hazel Blears? Wouldn't a robot, instructed to spout whatever the party line is at a given moment, be just as effective?

Report
monkeytrousers · 05/08/2005 07:50

lol!

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.