Heidi Klum's 8 year old daughter described as a "leggy beauty"

[NicholasTeakozy]

By the Daily Heil (Not a Mail link). This is beyond disgusting and really creepy. I know they don't care as they actively seek outrage as it provides publicity and therefore clicks so the money keeps rolling in, but surely there's a law against taking photos of children and putting them online?

[LumpySpacePrincessOhMyGlob]

That is truly vile, it completely objectifies and demeans a child. I see they have removed said quote now.

[Highlander]

Ugh, sexual objectifcation of an 8 year old.

[SinisterSal]

Creepy.

[sonlypuppyfat]

Disgusting.

[MaggieMaggieMaggieMcGill]

I was coming in here to say, in the daily mail by any chance!

[SoupDragon]

This was dated Jan 28, 2013

[nicename]

Poor kid. I hope mum didn't think it was a compliment.

Shame they didn't say 'happy', 'arty' or 'smart' or even 'really good speller'.

[NicholasTeakozy]

Sorry Soupy for not checking the date, I don't click Daily Heil links and have Kitten Block for when they are hidden. However old the story is (and 8 months is hardly ancient history) this is a valid indictment in how they view young girls. See how often they're castigated for posting revealing photos of teenaged girls. They're utterly abhorrent, they know it and don't care because our outrage is making them richer. Vile.

[SoupDragon]

It is ancient history if people were thinking of making a complaint.
Which is why I pointed out the date.
I don't need a lecture on the Daily Mail thanks.

[elinorbellowed]

FFS