link to article
This made me smile yesterday. Especially the bit about having 12 albums of photos - 8 of which are of her first born. This holds true in the moo household too. We photographed every single aspect of ds1's existence - have photo's of first smile, first injury (holding a cardboard sign with an arrow to point out a miniscule scrape!), first taste of baby rice (well, I videoed that), chicken pox, ds1 eating, ds1 sleeping....
Ds2? Well, the Moorhead article says it all really!
Interesting that first borns are supposed to be more successful in life - I had heard that but wasn't sure if it was true or just a rumour put about by firstborns (of which I am one).
So...thoughts? Do second and subsequent children get overlooked/treated differently? I think in my case ds2 has been but I think it's kind of healthy. Ds1 was so scrutinised, and mine and dh's relationship with him was so intense. He's turned into a very sensitive, shy little boy (maybe he would have anyway). Ds2 just got thrown in at the deep end and is a much more happy-go-lucky, get stuck in, outgoing little chap.
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
News
Joanna Moorhead article in Wednesday's Guardian about firstborns
24 replies
marthamoo · 25/08/2005 09:46
OP posts:
MaloryTowers ·
25/08/2005 09:49
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
Hausfrau ·
25/08/2005 09:51
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
Hausfrau ·
25/08/2005 10:16
This reply has been deleted
Message withdrawn at poster's request.
Don’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.