Skip to main content
Skip to main navigation
Skip to talk navigation

Active discussions

Please or to access all these features

Add post

Watch this thread

Save thread

Start a new thread

Flip thread

Hide thread

My feed

Saved Active Unanswered threads

Getting started FAQ's

Unanswered threads Acronyms Talk guidelines

Hide shortcut buttons

Talk

Flip

Geeky stuff

Thinking of buying a second hand DSLR

19 replies

motherofvikings · 03/05/2013 07:17

I want a DSLR. :)

But u don't have the £ for a new one. Is second hand a bad idea? I had a look at London camera exchange and they have a couple of Nikon d40 which seem like a good started DSLR.

can anyone tell me if this is a bad idea? :)

OP posts:

Report

MrsShrek3 · 03/05/2013 07:23

good idea imho. DH has regularly bought and sold dslr kit, including on ebay (although I wouldn't recommend that without his considerable level of geekery!)

research lots first so you know what you're looking at and thwarting price range that looks reasonable. Try before you buy.
good luck

MrsShrek3 · 03/05/2013 07:24

thwarting??? im sure i said THE....and obv got autocorrected

motherofvikings · 04/05/2013 13:03

Oh goody! :)

Can anyone tell me some good learner DSLR cameras?
Budget will be under £300

:)

OP posts:

sneezecakesmum · 04/05/2013 14:27

I bought this model off eBay and it has been a brilliant buy. Also bought amazon d40 book as its a bit complicated and an additional lens. 100% recommend the Nikon DSLR

motherofvikings · 04/05/2013 17:17

Sorry sneezecakes - was that the Nikon d40 you bought?

The only thing holding me back is that it was introduced in 2006(?) so may well be a fair age.

OP posts:

sneezecakesmum · 04/05/2013 21:12

Yes Nikon d40 dslr. I know re the age thing as I was a bit worried about that but it takes lovely pics. I am not an expert or anything though.!! There are some good reviews on the d40 on amazon. I read through those to help me decide. They date back to 2007/8 but still valid and gives all the information you need. Price wise you are looking at 160 -£200 +. The cannon EOS 400d? Is very similar and with good reviews. Everyone in the know say don't waste your money on a bridge camera, if you want to learn and take real photos go for the DSLR. One on eBay looks good but I would go to see it first if possible. The D40 or the cannon is a good way to start to build up confidence without spending a fortune on a white elephant.

MrsShrek3 · 05/05/2013 23:41

Imho age isn't necessarily an issue, esp if it's been owned by a geek who has treated it lovingly. My camera is from 2003, was new, still immaculate and has probably been treated better than my dc
my mother was a photographer and her "newest" camera is 2002, whilst her "proper" slr (aka not digital) was bought in 1980

Kickarsequeen · 05/05/2013 23:43

Get one! You will only wish you did it sooner!

motherofvikings · 08/05/2013 08:08

Just need to wait till my birthday and try and find some money

OP posts:

niceguy2 · 08/05/2013 09:39

I've just seen this thread. I'm a part time wedding photographer and unsurprisingly photography is something I'm quite keen on.

In your shoes I would NOT get a D40. The reason being is that it is an old camera now and made around 2006. Camera technology has moved on leaps and bounds since then.

With a budget of around £300 I would recommend something like the Nikon D3100 which is a starter DSLR, brand new from Amazon, comes with 2 year warranty and if you buy it before the end of May an extra £30 cashback.

To compare the pictures, where you will see the biggest difference is indoors when the light isn't great. Older cameras will struggle to give you clean images. Plus the lens you get with the D3100 has Vibration Reduction (VR) which means it will try to compensate for shakey hands. Very useful if you are going to be shooting in indoors when shutter speeds are lower. It makes for sharper photos.

Another brand worth looking at if you don't mind 2nd hand, are the Sony SLT range which I personally think is a great starter SLR camera since the technology means you can use the liveview virtually all the time and the camera shows you on both the screen/viewfinder how the photo will look. In other words if you have your settings wrong and the photo will be too dark, the screen will also be darker. And vice versa. It's much easier to tell that looking at the light meter. The Sony A33 or A35 would be ideal starter models for you.

Hope that helps

motherofvikings · 08/05/2013 12:08

That is VERY helpful! :)

Thank you!

I didn't think I could get a DSLR for that little so haven't even looked at new ones yet.

Must remember to turn off one click before I search on amazon! :)

OP posts:

motherofvikings · 08/05/2013 12:09

I'm a bit about Sony cameras as they need their own special Sony cards etc. we have a Sony point and click and its a pita that it has a Sony specific memory card/ cables etc.

OP posts:

niceguy2 · 08/05/2013 15:02

Nah, the Sony cameras i had used standard SD cards. They have a little slot now which will accept standard SD and also the Sony memory cards which noone bothers with.

I've used Sony until more recently when I decided to switch to full frame as any self respecting wedding photographer should. Unfortunately the Sony FF camera the A99 is ridiculously priced.

There are still many features I miss on the Sony cameras though. Top of the list being the live preview. It makes life so easy to be able to see when your photo is going to be over/underexposed.

The biggest downside of Sony is the lack of lenses. That said they have all the lenses that any amateur would want. The other bonus is that Sony camera body's have IBIS which is their equivalent of Vibration Reduction (VR). What this means is that every lens you attach is stablised unlike Canon/Nikon where you pay literally hundreds more per lens for that feature.

Add on top the fact you can get the legendary beer can lens which is a long zoom (70-200 f4) for < £100 and you have a very cost effective camera system to learn with.

I'd fully recommend Sony to anyone learning. But if you want to take your photography more seriously then I'd say look elsewhere like Canon/Nikon. But by that stage, you'll know why.

sneezecakesmum · 08/05/2013 21:28

I have a 55-200 Nikon lens with VR and it wasnt especially expensive new

MrsShrek3 · 08/05/2013 22:52

Dh has the Nikon 3100. I thought of that too but didn't say It is a brilliant camera, esp at the price. we have spent considerably more in the past for not such amazing results

niceguy2 · 08/05/2013 23:09

True sneezecakes, there are some lenses which have VR which are cheap as chips. But with Sony every lens is stablised. Even primes and aging Minolta lenses.

beachyhead · 08/05/2013 23:18

I've just bought the Nikon 3100 as a starter camera, it was recommended by BIL who is a professional photographer. It was under £300....

sneezecakesmum · 09/05/2013 21:22

nikon d3100 £279.99 cashback applies Cant be bad!

sneezecakesmum · 09/05/2013 21:30

£30 cashback that is. Megashopbot says this is the cheapest...you'll have to get it now

Flip

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.