
Note: Please bear in mind that this is a discussion board, not a place to advertise childcare vacancies or recruit childminders/nannies etc. We don't mind the odd mumsnet regular mentioning that they're looking for a job/mindee (although you're probably better off in MN Local) but repeated job "ads" and posts from nanny/babysitting agencies aren't fair to people who are paying for small business ads. Do feel free to report any you see. Thanks, MNHQ.
Nanny looking after own DS and charges in nanny's home?
|
(49 Posts)
|
I've been a nanny for over 15 years and now have my own DS. I have finally found a family who sound v keen on me being their nanny for 3 days a week and taking my DS with me. I'm going to see them on Monday, and am making a list of things we'll need to discuss if it all goes ahead.
One thing I can't find any info about, is if it would be illegal to have the children at my house occasionally (We'd be at their house most of the time but just wondering about times when DS wasn't well etc, and wondering if on occasion she'd be able to drop her children to me on her way to work).
I know a nanny looks after children in someone else's house, and a childminder looks after children in their own home, but wondering where we'd stand with it being a sort of nannyshare (sharing the childcare between hers and my families, sort of).
Does anyone know where I can find this sort of info out, please? Or would it just a be something me and the lady I'm going to see would decide between ourselves?
Just thought I'd let you know I have the job!
Nanny insurance is also designed to cover the person not the home, but the definitions they use say 'in and from' the child's home and it would be quite hard to justify why you had the children at your own home whilst you were working. Not a route I would want to go down tbh. You're automatically covered for 'attendance at exhibitions, creches, meetings and outings run for and on behalf of nannies' but that doen't cover your own home.
but surely taking the children there once in a while and an accident ocurring is just the same as if you took the children to a friends or on an outing and an accident occurred surely you would still be covered or r you only covered if you are in the house when accident occurs. i am a childminder i am insured to my home address but am covered for anywhere i take the children. its me thats insured not my house.
Moved house today and came back to see what the conclusion is... My brain hurts from reading and trying to keep up with all that!
Very much appreciate it, all

Kitter - hope it is now all clear. Well clear as mud

If it was only in exceptional circumstances then you should be fine (though note that your nanny insurance may not cover you on those occasions).
But you should still have nanny insurance, which doesn't usually cover you in your hown home. So if a charge has an accident there then you're not covered.
I don't understand why this legislation is so badly worded (or why half of it exists in the first place but that's another story).
Cross-posted - thanks for the pointer, I was slowly working through the
revised statutes online.
Yes Nick, as usual you are absolutely right - the section of the 1989 Act I have been quoting was amended by the Care Standards Act 2000 which came into effect 2.7.2001 in England and 1.4.2002 in Wales.
What I should of course have been quoting was the exemptions used in subsequent acts which you helpfully pointed me towards and I ignored (sorry, I blame the drugs - long story).
So to paraphrase the provisions of current legislation:
Where a person looks after a child for the parents and the work consists of looking after the child wholly or mainly in the child's home the work is not to be treated as child minding.
So again, if you are a nanny that takes your charges home once in a while you are not childminding, you don't need to register as a child minder and you don't need child minder's insurance.
I think current def is in Care Standards Act 2000, if that part of it still remains in law.
Good point Nick. Where on Earth does that leave us, because that is where the distinction between childminding and nannying that I quoted that everyone understands comes from?
Off to check sources.