My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

Get advice and support with infant feeding from other users here.

Infant feeding

Fore milk / hind milk not true?

21 replies

Nancy54 · 11/02/2013 16:16

So many midwives text etc told me about the fire milk hind milk thing, that I shouldn't feed little and often cos they'd only get the fore milk.

I ignored advice in the end because they (twins) wanted to feed v regularly but always had slight guilt about it given advice but just followed my instincts and fed.

I've read on here a few times that it is a myth. Is it really? I was told about it as if it was scientifically proven or something!

I have been given such crap advice from hcps re bf, it's incredible.

OP posts:
Report
Nancy54 · 11/02/2013 16:18

Diont know why it says text after midwife on first line, plus I meant fore not fire obvs. Bloody phone

OP posts:
Report
Midori1999 · 11/02/2013 16:33

It's not that it's a myth, it's just that its no lot really helpful to use the terms fore and hind milk as it gives the impression that the breasts produce two types of milk, which they don't.

What does happen is that the milk at the start of a feed is more watery, but gradually becomes more fatty and when the breast is most 'empty' ( they can't really be empty) the milk is fattiest. However, if you have fed a short while ago and then feed again, the milk will still be fattier at the start of that feed than if you left it several hours before feeding again. It's a bit like a hot tap in a way. Hen you turn the tap on, the water is cold. Then, as it runs, it gradually gets warmer until its at its hottest. If you turn the tap off and then turn it back on after a couple of minutes, it will still be warm and gradually get hotter again. If you leave the tap off for a long time, it will start off cold again and gradually get hotter. The fat in breast milk sort of works the same way. Does that make sense?

Report
MoreSnowPlease · 11/02/2013 19:13

This reply has been withdrawn

Withdrawn at poster's request

StarlightMcKenzie · 11/02/2013 19:16

It's not a myth, it's just irrelevant and a very unhelpful way of terming it.

Don't feed little and often, just feed when the baby demands it (which will be often, but probably not too little).

But well done for feeding twins. Blimey!!

Report
Nancy54 · 11/02/2013 19:37

Yeah that's really well explained midori! Thank you! If only hcps knew this....

OP posts:
Report
Lostonthemoors · 11/02/2013 19:45

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Nancy54 · 12/02/2013 06:36

That's really interesting, lost, thanks

OP posts:
Report
VivaLeBeaver · 12/02/2013 07:10

Research on this has changed so it depends how old your twins are and how updated the midwives have kept themselves.

When I did my training we were taught about hind milk and foremilk and thats what was in the text books, then about 5 or 6 years ago all the advice was changed.

Report
Nancy54 · 12/02/2013 07:40

They are 20 weeks!

OP posts:
Report
Lostonthemoors · 12/02/2013 07:44

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

NotQuiteCockney · 12/02/2013 09:59

Oooh, I like that tap metaphor, will be nicking it and sharing it, thanks!

Report
tiktok · 12/02/2013 13:04

viva is right - midwives were taught (and are sometimes still taught, I think) the wrong thing about fore/hindmilk.

The research didn't change - we're still using the same research that shows milk composition changes as volume of milk in the breast reduces. That was right then, and it is right now :)

But unfortunately, it was badly misinterpreted to mean 'babies should only feed on one side per feed' to the detriment of mothers, babies and breastfeeding.

I don't think it actually got into the text books as wrong, though...but what people hear is probably more powerful when it comes to practice.

Report
VivaLeBeaver · 12/02/2013 20:54

I would like to think the message gets through to staff when research changes.

We're lucky in our trust that we have a very good infant feeding coordinator who makes sure were up to date with stuff. Other trusts may not be as good in updating their staff.

Report
Nancy54 · 13/02/2013 09:20

Actually, I live in France and the advice I received here was so dated and or wrong. Just as an example, At the hospital, I was told that it wasn't possible to breast feed twins because I wouldn't have enough milk.

I nearly didn't end up breast feeding because it was so crap. I had to fight not to ff.

OP posts:
Report
Contradictionincarnate · 15/02/2013 11:56

I definitely think the advice comes across wrong I kept being told dd needed to be fed at least 25 mins but simply didn't want to - wanted to do lots of 10 min feeds and some longer feeds ... it probably did coincide with the longer gaps of feeding ala tap similie (which I agree is fab).
I was v worried is she getting enough? but she put on almost a whole lb in a week at 2-3 weeks so I decided stuff it and went with the flow!

Report
LeBFG · 15/02/2013 14:36

So interesting - esp the link. Thanks for that. I have a question. I used to do one feed-one breast based on this notion of fore/hind milk. I would note which boob was used and use the other the next feed. Is this technique still OK? Or is it better to switch between boobs at each feed? If it's better to switch, how do you know when is the best moment to switch?

Report
LeBFG · 15/02/2013 14:38

And although total daily milk consumption is the important factor, doesn't a fattier meal mean baby goes longer between feeds?

Report
nickelbabe · 15/02/2013 14:39

I only ever fed DD on one side per feed.

that's probably quite useful if you've got twins Grin

Report
NotQuiteCockney · 15/02/2013 15:01

Re: switching - I'd say, generally, it's good to offer the second breast, when your child has had enough of the first one.

Some babies never really come off, voluntarily, but can be swapped over without a struggle when their feeding has slowed down a lot.

But switching is a Bad Idea if you tend towards oversupply, and an Excellent Idea if you tend towards undersupply - so it really does depend. (If you really have undersupply, then it's worth offering 3 or 4 breasts in a feed.)

Report
tiktok · 15/02/2013 15:04

The rule is there is no rule :)

It is as meaningless to stick to one breast only as it is to stick to 2 breasts every time - unless either or these is what your baby indicates he wants.

Deliberately only using one breast each time leads to a risk for some women that you make insufficient milk - milk supply is driven by frequent removal of milk, and if you only ever use each breast once every (say) 4-6 hours or more, you risk not making enough. Women bf twins automatically stimulate the milk production frequently on both sides so none of this applies :)

So it's good to at least offer the second side in the early weeks when bf is getting established.

No, babies don't go longer if they stay on one breast, removing the fattier milk to keep them from being hungry for longer. They need volume as well as fat. And you get more volume into a baby if you offer both sides.

Report
TheDeadlyDonkey · 15/02/2013 15:05

I like this blog post it has some very good photos.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.