Getting exceedingly p'd off with the whole EDD thing. 38 + 6 today and baby theoretically due next Saturday. But of course could have been born at any point in preceding two weeks, or two weeks after.
Which is a bit crap really. They probably predicted baby's due date with as much accuracy 500 years ago.
Surely there must be some statistical analysis taking into account baby's size, previous pregnancies, mothers weight/height, genetic indicators etc which would let you predict with greater accuracy than 'some point within x four weeks'.
Bet if it was men that got pregnant, your due date would be calculable down to the hour and you'd receive daily count down text reminders!
As you can tell, I'm a bit fed up!
Please or to access all these features
Please
or
to access all these features
AIBU?
to think that an 'estimated' due date in 2013 is not good enough
81 replies
Thyeternalsummer · 26/07/2013 11:40
OP posts:
Don’t want to miss threads like this?
Weekly
Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!
Log in to update your newsletter preferences.
You've subscribed!
Please create an account
To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.