My feed
Premium

Please
or
to access all these features

AIBU?

To think Andrew Wakefield has blood on his hands for causing so much distrust over the MMR?

999 replies

chicaguapa · 06/04/2013 19:38

That's it really. He's caused so much damage with his stupid little study. It was years ago, he was struck off, the study was discredited, but people still don't get the MMR because of it. Angry

OP posts:
Report
EllieArroway · 06/04/2013 19:42

Damn right.

Report
quietbatperson · 06/04/2013 19:45

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

BrianCoxandTheTempleofDOOM · 06/04/2013 19:45

YANBU - parents did what they believed to be right with the massively hyped opinion of this man and now the.price of misinformation and media hype is clear for all to see.

Angry

Report
DoctorAnge · 06/04/2013 19:46

What a load of nonsense. Do you actually know what reasons parents have for not vaccinating? Or are you just so angry that not everyone is you?

Report
KC225 · 06/04/2013 19:46

YANBU

Report
tilder · 06/04/2013 19:48

Yanbu.

But a load of people will be in in a minute to say 'but what about...' Rare as hens teeth stuff.

Report
Levantine · 06/04/2013 19:49

Yanbu

Report
macdoodle · 06/04/2013 19:49

YABU! For years and years, the medical community have been trying to undo the damage and correctly inform people of the risks of not vaccinating. And now its come back to bite them on the bum, they are yet again looking for someone to blame Angry
Time the great British public took responsibility for its own foolish actions.

Report
ThingsThatMakeYouGoHmmmmmmmmm · 06/04/2013 19:52

Hmmmmmmmmmmmm.........I really do wonder what the reasons those parents would give for not vaccinating. I wonder how many of them are now outside emergency clinics.

OP YANBU.

Report
EllieArroway · 06/04/2013 19:52

Do you actually know what reasons parents have for not vaccinating?

Well, given that on every single MMR thread I have ever seen on here, 90% of non-vaccinating parents cite their concern about autism as the reason.

The other 10% have legitimate concerns about previous bad reactions and so on.

So it's not rubbish, as it happens.

Report
chickensaladagain · 06/04/2013 19:55

one of my dds has had the mmr, the other not

dd2 2 has an autoimmune disorder as her consultant advised against MMR, so she relies on herd immunity

so many people, when the find out she hasn't had the MMR (like when she had rubella) are shocked and lecture me about the importance of getting it done -err I know that, that's why dd1 has had it

fortunately I don't live close to the outbreak but I will be speaking her doctors again to find out if they still advise not to have it

Andrew Wakefield obviously had his own agenda but I can't believe the long term damage he has done

Report
currentbuns · 06/04/2013 19:57

One of the things that annoys me most about a lot of non-vaccinating parents is the fact that they happily rely upon herd immunity (ie the fact that most other people DO vaccinate) to protect their own children.

Report
ravenAK · 06/04/2013 19:57

YANBU.

But also sort of agree with macdoodle re: the public's foolish actions.

If I were one of the parents currently trying to get emergency vax, after refusing it when it was routinely offered, I think I'd feel a bit sheepish now.

But, well, people act in what they perceive to be their children's best interests at the time. Can't really blame them for being misinformed.

Report
currentbuns · 06/04/2013 19:57

Oh, and I completely agree re AW.

Report
currentbuns · 06/04/2013 19:59

Sorry, chickens, my post re herd immunity was not in any way directed at you!

Report
dizzyhoneybee · 06/04/2013 20:01

He did his studies, like everybody who is a parent we can read the studies and make our own decision. There were plenty of other studies who said that it was safe.
We, as parents, have to take responsibility for our own decisions.

Report
kim147 · 06/04/2013 20:01

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

EndoplasmicReticulum · 06/04/2013 20:03

Was an interesting article about Wakefield and others and what he is up to now in the Guardian today.

www.guardian.co.uk/society/2013/apr/06/what-happened-man-mmr-panic

Report
kim147 · 06/04/2013 20:04

This reply has been deleted

Message withdrawn at poster's request.

Crawling · 06/04/2013 20:04

I have a ds with AS a dd with severe autism and dd2 is slightly speech delayed. All had mmr I hate what he said because although logically I know it was crap there is always this doubt and self blame because of it.

Report
ananikifo · 06/04/2013 20:04

YANBU.

Nothing else to say really.

Report
gazzalw · 06/04/2013 20:05

I think the problem is that many middle-class parents think they know better than the 'powers that be' about such things. And I say this as the husband of one of those 'challenging authority in a I know better' way types! However we have professionally informed family members so got our two vaccinated as per guidelines. And our two are blond(e) which apparently made them more 'at risk' Hmm. Apparently the higher up the social class register you go the greater the non-compliance on MMR. Seem to recall in our very middle-class ante-natal group that only one other couple apart from us had their DC vaccinated with the MMR...

Report

Don’t want to miss threads like this?

Weekly

Sign up to our weekly round up and get all the best threads sent straight to your inbox!

Log in to update your newsletter preferences.

You've subscribed!

EllieArroway · 06/04/2013 20:05

He did his studies, like everybody who is a parent we can read the studies and make our own decision

It's not really that simple. For a start, his study was flat out fraudulent (that's why he was struck off) and it's not reasonable for the average person to make any decision based on a scientific study. Most of us don't understand science or risk well enough to make a reasoned and informed decision. We need our doctors to explain it - they tried, an awful lot of people didn't listen.

Kim's link explains it perfectly.

Report
marriedinwhiteagain · 06/04/2013 20:06

No I don't blame Andrew Wakefield. He conducted one study - the NHSs had a lot more studies and entirely failed to convey the results in an honest and intellectual manner to those who needed to hear more than this is what the leaflet says. The leaflet ran to an A4 folded tryptich. It was not comprehensive and those quoting its mantra were unablel to have a full and frank discussison about what lay behind it. "Do it because the leaflet says so" was not, in my opinion good enough.

Report
Floweryhat · 06/04/2013 20:07

YANBU however, the journal that published it originally has a LOT to answer for too.

Report
Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.