To wonder why virtually every woman in labour / partner / mum of woman in labour on OBEM has tattoos?

(66 Posts)
CruCru Fri 01-Mar-13 17:56:53

Do so many people have them? Or just in Leeds (where OBEM is currently set)? It's starting to distract me from the show.

MidnightMasquerader Sat 02-Mar-13 08:55:16

The best thing, surely, has to simply be people not reacting to all these anti-tattoo threads, and then they'd just die a death.

If you have a tattoo, do you really care that some faceless random on t'internet doesn't like them?? confused

Seriously - just ignore such sneery, small-minded people. They're not worth it.

MidnightMasquerader Sat 02-Mar-13 08:56:54

Actually, apologies to this OP - it's not as bad as most of these threads. There have just been such a rash of them, that they all blend into one.

thegreylady Sat 02-Mar-13 09:32:56

Thanks Emmeline it is beautiful isn't it?

Shesparkles Sat 02-Mar-13 09:38:01

That tattoo is wonderful, and I can totally understand why the woman has it. I think these kind of circumstances might change my " I like them on others but they're not for me" stance. One of my friends has a beautiful tree of life on her inner wrist, and were it not be for the fact that it would be copying hers, I could have been tempted into something similar, but copying someone else's seems to go against the whole point of tattoos to me.

I have a few tattoos, and I live near Leeds.

I wouldn't go on OBEM though. Nothing against those who do.

I'm interested by the thought that maybe people who don't have tattoos are the ones that don't go on OBEM. What a funny theory!

ShellyBoobs Sat 02-Mar-13 10:00:38

Maybe the sort of women who don't have tattoos are the ones who don't choose to appear on the programme ?

^^ This.

I think tattoos are quite popular but not to the extent you would assume from OBEM.

Personally I don't like tattoos but then again I really don't care what anyone else chooses to adorn their body with.

ShellyBoobs Sat 02-Mar-13 10:11:27

I'm interested by the thought that maybe people who don't have tattoos are the ones that don't go on OBEM. What a funny theory!

Well, I suppose it depends on what angle you're considering it from.

My assumption is that someone comfortable enough to appear on OBEM is probably comfortable enough to not care what others think about their decision to have a tattoo.

Similarly, someone who is concerned that others would judge them for having a tattoo is probably not going to fancy laying, legs akimbo, fanjo on display, on TV.

fatlazymummy Sat 02-Mar-13 13:50:41

Well I wouldn't go on OBEM because I'm a very private person. I don't have any tattoos - I'm not sure why really. I don't dislike them or really have an opinion either way. It's just something I've never done.
Can't really see a correlation in my sample of one.

mrsjay Sat 02-Mar-13 13:52:42

Is it tattoo week on here how can a tattoo distract from puffing and panting and bums in the air thats all I see when I watch OBEM grin

willesden Sat 02-Mar-13 14:58:59

I read last week that 20% of adults in the UK have them.

And 100% of them are working class.

What utter rubbish willesden hmm

everlong Sat 02-Mar-13 15:22:09

Dh asked why they're all rough buggers on OBEM the other day.
biscuit

Peevish Sat 02-Mar-13 15:26:47

I think Willesden may have a point - though I admit to having seen only a few minutes of about three different OBEM episodes ever, so don't know myself (and have never noticed anyone's tattoos...)

Having said that, I don't think I've ever seen a middle-middle class woman/couple/family or 'above' on that programme, and as I assume the unit where it's filmed treats people of all social classes, could it be that it's overwhelmingly working-class/lower-middle class people who choose to be filmed? For whatever reason, given it's clearly not the cash!

Again, speculating here as nil knowledge of the hospital or the programme.

But there might be a correlation between social class and the frequency and kind of tattoos?

leniwhite Sat 02-Mar-13 19:06:21

The 666 story was definitely not a wind up - it was in Glastonbury where there are lots of strange tales...

I don't think there's really a 'sort of lady' who has tattoos anymore. I'm so middle class it's painful and I had mine to cover some horrific scars which people used to abuse me in the street for, but bearing in mind how much it costs it doesn't follow that only working class ladies have them, a decent artist costs upwards of £70 per hour and each one full arm is over 20 hours! Possibly then type of tattoos ('off the wall' designs) comes into that?

Maybe it's fair to say certain industries have a higher percentage of tattooed people (eg I'd been in the music industry for 15 years before diverting to The City) but the whole 20% thing is not representative of class in terms of frequency of tattoos - maybe more smaller ones but definitely not as much big work

FakePlasticLobsters Sat 02-Mar-13 19:09:37

They have them because they wanted them.

Because most people have them possibly ?

Join the discussion

Join the discussion

Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.

Register now