Today, we had a meeting with the genetics doctor who gave us the diagnosis we were waiting for, for our youngest two daughters.
I am not sure how I feel, it has been a long time coming and in the end was a bit of an anti climax.
So, I am the mother of two children with a totally preventative disorder. Foetal Alcohol Syndrome.
I know they are still the same children and I love them unconditionally but I feel so sad for them. Their birth mothers addiction was more important than the babies she was carrying.
Don't really know why I am writing this, some support and sympathy would be nice.
Quick update...... One of the positives for the diagnosis is we were able to claim and have been awarded DLA for dd3.
It means so much more than the money.
I may now suffer the dreadful form and apply for dd2.
Sorry I missed this earlier momoomie . Well done on persevering through the process.im sure , as others have said, that having the official dx will allow you to access more help for the girls. Or fight to keep it
Don't feel bad about feeling angry with DDs BM. Emotions are neither wrong nor right, they just are. It's what you do with the feelings that are right or wrong. I know you have a hard journey ahead as you need to explain to the girls, in time, why they are the way they are.
As to the criticism on another thread from a SW-all I can say is that it's easier to understand why your client has injured another person ( who you have never met) than to understand why soemone has brain injured your own child. My experince is that SS are not exactly forgiving when soemone disagrees with them, let alone physically harms them. When I see a Sw on here justifying why someone has injured or killed their child, I will be willing to listen to lectures from them.
This is not intended to be disrespectful to all the wonderful parenst who ARE able to forgive soemone who has killed or injured their child. I have the utmost respect for them
So vent away all you like here.
Great news on the DLa. I agree it matterS far more than the money and I think that everyone entitled shoudl claim it for their children. Even if you don't " need" the money , you can put in into an account for your child when he/she is older. Somehow it's an official recognition of what they have been through and the wrongs done to them, by an individual and by the system. A bit like Criminal Injuries compensation payment.
On a practical note -don't forget to apply for your railcard ( unless you are on the lowest rate for the care component )
Thank you Kristina. I'm afraid you have lost me though about the other thread you mention.
Also I have not heard about the railcard, I will have to look into that.
Moomoonie me too so sorry that you now have this diagnosis, but as others have said, it is probably better that you do have it, so that you can best help your daughters, and get educational support for them, and financial support.
I am the social worker who got cross with adoptors for calling BMs insulting names but I will return to that later.
I placed a baby for adoption some 21 years ago and the mother was an alcoholic. The baby was removed at birth and placed for adoption at 7 months. I came across the adoptive parents (as they still fostered for the LA) many years later and naturally asked how the child (S) was and learned all about the fact that she had FAS and the troubles that they had had with her over the years, but loved her immensely. I regret to say that I knew nothing about FAS at all at this time and had never even heard of it. This was in the late 90s. I felt very sad for the adoptive parents and S for all that had happened. She was 23 when I had the chance meeting with the adoptors and was still causing difficulties.
Fast forward the tape to 2003 and I was working independently and was assessing some relatives to care for their niece (A) (a baby of 8 months who had been removed from the mother, who was addicted to drugs and alcohol). As part of the assessment I went to visit the baby in the foster home and the minute I saw her, she reminded me of (S) who I had placed all those years ago. It was extraordinary, same mishappen head, very thin top lip, giving the mouth a "fishy" appearance, very tiny for her age (small for dates). I mentioned this to the foster carers who were very experienced and had just received an OBE for fostering and they said they too had wondered about this because they had fostered another baby who looked exactly like A and her mother was an alcoholic.
The babay (A) had of course had all the medicals given she was a Looked Aftered Child and no concerns had been raised. I contacted the HV and got short shrift, saying there was nothing wrong. I got a similar response from the GP and the sw for the child had never heard of FAS. I went on to google and found a great deal of information, and at that time some 80% of children in the UK were not being diagnosed, whilst of course in the states it was diagnosed frequently. Fortunately the guardian for the child was someone with whom I used to work, and we had a mutual respect for each other. She insisted that the LA pay for an expert from Glasgow to come and see this baby (A). This he did and confirmed that she definitely had FAS, but what he could not say (as this of course is a syndrome) what her future would be, as it would only become clear over time. He said that she could be anywhere from completely normal to severely affected, and cautioned that often FAS children are just seen as defiant obstructive pupils in school as they do not appear to have learning difficulties as such.
I don't know what happened to baby A because the aunt and uncle, quite sensibly I think withdrew their offer as they already had 3 young children under 5.
I do hope that you get all the support you need for your much loved daughters.
Dame Kewcumber as you will know from my name I am the social worker who took issue (rather than "told off" but I can understand that's how it felt) with some adoptors who called the birthparents "pond life" and there was an ensuing exchange of posts by adoptors whomade their feelings very clear to me and I can't recall now but I think I probably tried to defend my position. In retrospect I can see why my defending the birthparents caused offence to adoptors. I suppose it was because I knew what awful lives the birthparents had endured. However I always told adoptors and foster carers that it was only natural for them to have such feelings and they should give vent to them, so long as this wasn't in front of the child. I still believe this, but for some reason (I think because of the anonymous nature of MN) I felt angry at the expression "pond life" and gave vent to my feelings about the natural feelings of adoptors and foster carers.
I apologise for this and realise it was quite wrong of me to react in the way I did.
I think I also upset you by making disparaging comments about inter country adoption and again I apologise for this, and can't remember what took me off in that direction.
Kristina I suppose the post to Kewcumber says it all really as I know you took great offence at my comments about birthparents and inter country adoption. I do feel however that you have a very low opinion of social workers in general and that my comments have "fuelled the fire" so to speak. It seems that you have construed my comments as "lectures" and I didn't mean my posts to sound like that at all, but I can of course accept that was your perception. I wholeheartedly accept that anyone (social worker) or not would feel very differently if it was their child that had been brain damaged or suffered serious injury through the action of the bps.
I can only apologise, and hope that the "hatchet" can now be buried.
It was me who caused the upset by calling DD's BP 'pondlife'. There are days when I really felt for them, losing their babies. There were also days when I dispaired, that was one of them... there have been others, many others.
Despite the difficulties our family has experienced, we love our children and will always support them.
The BP were given lots of letters and photographs through the mailbox that was set up, we put a lot of thought into striking the right balance. We received very little in return, and what we got was so questionable that some of it was withheld by SS. Eventually it stopped from their side altogether.
My problem with the children's BP is this. This was a wholly preventable and life changing situation that no longer affects them... due to their ongoing behaviour, not DD's FAS.
DD's condition has an huge impact on her life and will continue to do so until after we've gone. We will attempt to put into place as much support as we can. We hope her brothers will always look out for her.
It also has an huge impact on our family life, the stress has made me ill.
moomoomie, all children with FAS have shades of the symptoms, so please don't be disheartened by my post. DD also has attachment disorder, due to neglect. She is a very complex, difficult at times, but lovely girl.
I can't always find forgiveness or empathy for the people who changed her course in life by harming her... but I'm glad she exists, and they made that happen. I just wish, for her, that they'd cared enough not to damage and neglect her. I might not have her, but she'd be the wonderful whole person that I occasionally get glimpses of.
I don't post in adoptions very often ( I'm not always strong enough...I stick to the lighthearted stuff), but I do read everything you all post. You're all fab and I take much comfort from your posts.
moomoomie, you already knew and loved your girls... lots of love to you all and I hope you all get the support you deserve. x
Can I please ask why a geneticist in particular would be needed to diagnose a syndrome directly cause by environmental factors ie BM's alcohol intake? Or was the doctor's role to rule out hereditary genetic conditions?
Both my DC have disorders; ASD and a blood-clotting deficiency so I'm interested in things like that and certainly when DS was in the process of diagnosis blood tests were taken for Fragile X, Angelman Syndrome and a few other things, but the dx was made by a paed specialising in neuro-diversity.
I love the last line of shocker's post and echo that sentiment. Good luck
NanaNina - I didn;t bring up that thread because I hold any ill will at all - I don;t generally have the attention span to hold a grudge! It was just an illustration of how we do sometimes use the adoption board as a place to voice things that we may not feel able to voice in real life and that Moomoomie shouldn't feel bad about using it for that.
Of it is always a shock when we realise that in fact it is an open forum and who knows who's reading it.
On the whole I think we are very accepting of birth paretns who make difficult or poor decisions which may be influenced by the life they in turn have had or the support they lack. My experience is on the whole that adoptive paretns are actually more understanding of this than the general public who tend to be of the "they should all be sterilised at birth" brigade.
Its just that sometimes its a struggle to connect with that empathy in us.
Thanks Kewcumber and I didn't actually feel that you were holding a grudge against me, but just thought I would use the opportunity to apologise for causing anyone offence.
shockers I think I owe you an apology too, as I massively over reacted to your "pond life" post. I think I probably tried too hard to defend my position, and I think I've explained the reason (as best as I am able) in the post to kewcumber upthread.
NanaNina, no need to apologise, you already did.
It's good to get a reaction sometimes... it lets me know that my deepest darkest thoughts are't always best aired in public.
Oops. Sorry didn't mean to stir up past threads!
nananina as adoptive parents we need somewhere we can moan and rant and we use this forum, as it is anonymous I know I can speak my mind. I normally have a lot of empathy for my children's birth mother, nd as I said up thread " there but the grace og God"
What I find very difficult at times to comphrend though, is that she was given an awful lot of help and support to come off the drugs and alcohol and she chose not to take it. So, yes, she did put her addiction before her unborn babies.
As she was with a new partner when dd3 was born, she was given the opportunity to change her life around and become the parent. She chose not to take it.
Unfortunately the drugs and alcohol took her life too at a very early age.
Yes I know what you mean Moomoomie have seen this many times. I think that the the outcome for drink and drug abuse are very poor for many people and it's difficult for people like us to understand. My only thought on this is that I believe drink and alcohol abuse are "self medication" for some buried trauma in their past (don't think this is a conscious thing at all) and maybe the only way they can bet by is by blotting it all out with drink and drugs.
Am worried about saying too much as posters might think I am defending bms (but I don't think you will think this shockers) as in a way I suppose I am. For me it is all about the cycle of deprivation and I worked in the same LA for many years and so saw up to 3 generations of people existing on the margins of society, with a myriad of social problems, drink, drugs, mental health problems, finance, domestic violence, sub standard housing (grotty flats) where the shops were all boarded up. Their children going into care was just something that happened and was nothing strange to them. Of course most of the kids had babies at 16 and so the cycle started all over again.
No govt (or anyone else for that matter) has any idea of how to break into this cycle. At the moment the govt is waging war on the poor in the most horrendous way. Sorry I will be off on a rant if I don't stop............
SO hope I haven't offended any adoptive parents this time, just trying to shed a bit of light on the bps, but don't expect adoptive parents caring for emotionally, physically, neglected children to feel any empathy towards the bps.
A very wise woman who I worked with used to say of adoptors and foster carers "we recruit these people who love children and want to keep them safe and give them a better life" and then on top of that we expect them to feel empathy for the birthparents who caused all the difficulties for the child, and which they cope with through the child's life"
I should have taken more notice!
I do have empathy for BM though. Without her I would not have my wonderful girls, so for that I am thankful.
I think with our BM it was not a case of a cycle of deprivation. She was brought up in a very ordinary household and had an ordinary childhood. I can't say what started her on the road she chose, but she did choose the road she followed. She had many chances and an awful lot of help to beat her addiction for the sake of her children.
Join the discussion
Registering is free, easy, and means you can join in the discussion, get discounts, win prizes and lots more.Register now
Already registered with Mumsnet? Log in to leave your comment or alternatively, sign in with Facebook or Google.
Please login first.